 |
Surveys
This
will be the “last call” on our two polls regarding
Effectiveness and Leadership for marketing and
business development. Add your votes below! Results
will be summarized on The Expertise Marketing™
blog.
What is the most difficult barrier
your firm faces in improving M & BD effectiveness?
What's your most difficult barrier
in leading professionals to accept forward-thinking M&BD changes?
News
Do
You Measure Up - Demonstrating the Effectiveness
of Your Marketing Activities is the Best Way to
Shore Up Your Budget in Uncertain Times. Issue
No. 2, March 2009. Suzanne is quoted in the cover
article.
Branding
fourth among five small business marketing pillars,
PWG Marketing, February 2009 (An adaptation of
my CMO magazine article.)
How
to Create a Culture of Growth at Your Firm,
Raintoday, February 2009.
SMPS
Connections featured this newsletter as a
"Tool of the Week," September 2008.
Read
a summary of Suzanne Lowe's upcoming book The
Integration Imperative.
New
from the Expertise Marketplace™ Blog
My "fight" with
Ford Harding
Marketers
should start leading PSF change!
My Big Question
#2
Maintaining
marketing morale in the face of layoffs
See
all the posts at the Expertise Marketplace blog
Subscribe
to the blog's RSS
feed for regular updates. (Need
RSS help?)
Subscribe
Did
a colleague forward this newsletter? Sign
up to receive your own copy.
|
 |
"I LOVE your newsletter. I think it’s
the best one I get. Full of real content and yet
not too long. Kudos!"
Diane
Schmalensee, Facilitator and President of Schmalensee
Partners
Recent
Issues
The Shared Accountability
Condundrum, April 2009
The Accountability Conundrum,
March 2009
Structural Challenges to Marketing
and Business Development Integration,
February 2009
You
can order
Marketplace Masters from Barnes &
Noble, Amazon, your favorite online bookseller,
or CEO-READ.
|
 |
The
Marketplace Master™ is a monthly email publication
on professional service marketing from Expertise Marketing,
LLC.
About
this month's issue
Production is proceeding on my upcoming book The Integration Imperative: Erasing
Marketing and Business Development Silos -- Once and for All -- in Professional Service Firms. It will be
out in late spring or early summer! Details will be announced on Expertise Marketing's web site, in this newsletter, and on my blog.
As I've done since the beginning of the year, last month I previewed the challenges
professional firms face in sharing accountability for improving marketing and business development
effectiveness. It can be a tough nut to crack.
And yet, when trying to integrate their marketing and business development functions, PSFs and B2Bs are
quite capable of change. They've launched numerous noteworthy efforts to address their structural and cultural
disconnectivity challenges. "Doing things differently" is alive and well.
Unfortunately, these laudable efforts can cause even more silos and organizational barriers. This is a
situation I've labeled "the paradox of doing things differently."

Suzanne Lowe
President, Expertise Marketing
Author, Marketplace Masters: How Professional Service
Firms Compete to Win
The Paradox of Doing Things
Differently
Let's review how some "doing things differently" approaches could actually
impede a firm's marketing and business development functional effectiveness.
The first example is related to the variable scope and often limited
responsibilities of the marketing and business development function. There is growing evidence that energetic,
persistent marketing and business development leaders are pushing their firms to let them define their
functions.
Who can blame them? Since the earliest days of the service marketing field, it has been largely up to marketers and business developers themselves to create their own functional purviews, forge their own growth avenues, and build their own skills.
Today, many marketers and business developers feel they must pursue
their own pathways. They consider this effort a positive one for themselves and their organizations. These
"doing things differently" pathfinders also draw attention to their organizations' flexibility, willingness to
evolve, and marketplace savvy. Indeed, we really do want our firms to be living, breathing, malleable
enterprises.
But consider what happens if the "doing things differently"
champion leaves her firm. Does the function she created stick around, even if she doesn't? All too often, the
individual leaves, and the functional advances that the organization had achieved leave too.
A second example is related to narrowly defined marketing and business development initiatives that are
typically championed by professionally brave individual leaders or small groups. Many of these piecemeal
initiatives begin as pilots endorsed by executive committees or special task forces, and are often only for
limited deployment at the geographic, line-of-business, or industry level. In concept, pilots make a lot of
sense.
But consider what happens if a business unit manager is allowed to launch a region-specific positioning
platform, and it gets out of synch with the positioning of the rest of the firm. Did executive managers fully
evaluate the integration potential of the platform as a whole, for it to help the entire firm move ahead? All
too often, because the pathway was paved by one individual or small team, and accommodated on a
situation-specific basis by executive managers, the answer is no.
Doing Things Differently - with Integration as the Goal
Despite their admirable zeal and the fact that these "doing things
differently" initiatives signify nimble and flexible enterprises, individual pathways and narrowly focused
initiatives carry the risk of creating organizational barriers. Without a formal framework for cross-functional
or enterprise-wide integration, they're in danger of creating more disconnectivity.
"Doing things differently," if managed with integration in mind, carries enormous potential to fulfill
the organization's ultimate goal of gaining market share, growing the "right" revenues, and optimally serving
clients.
Kate
Kirkpatrick, whose elevation to the chief marketing
officer position at the architectural firm Gensler, serves as a classic example of "doing
things differently" -- with integration as the goal
- while driving successful marketplace gains for the
entire firm.
Kirkpatrick related the following story when she co-presented with me at SMPS's national conference in August 2007. Our topic was
enhancing the marketing function's leadership potential in architecture, engineering, and construction firms.
When she considered this challenge, she began by doing her homework about practitioners' general perceptions of
her function. She reviewed the findings of a reputable organization's survey of CEOs. In that survey, a full 75
percent of respondents agreed that marketing is more important than ever.
But when they were asked about their perception of marketing's priorities, less than 50 percent
believed that what keeps them awake at night are at the top of marketing's agenda. They pointed out that
"marketing is not aligned with the CEO's agenda," and that instead marketing focuses "on tactical issues such as
maintaining branding guidelines, sharing best practices, and counseling divisions." They wanted marketing to
provide measurable outcomes and a clear return on investment, but they felt that marketing's metrics were not up
to the task.
Kirkpatrick then interviewed leading Gensler practitioners, whose comments echoed the CEO survey. When
she asked Gensler marketers about the challenges they faced in becoming more strategically effective for their
firm, she heard responses that were not about practice growth or strategic alignment, but about other types of
issues, including time management and workload.
"Marketers weren't perceived to have the right priorities and the right toolkits. We were seen as
replaceable," said Kirkpatrick. "And we didn't see what the real problem was-that, as a group, we didn't have
the practice knowledge to stand at the same level as our design and client leaders."
From there, Kirkpatrick embarked on one of many initiatives to simultaneously enhance her strategic
contribution to her firm and advance professionally. By volunteering personal time, and with the support of an
influential mentor within the firm, she built the knowledge base and relationships within the firm to eventually
lead to a significant revenue-generating function. She understood the importance of developing personal
expertise within her firm's core business services.
Kirkpatrick took on responsibilities that assimilated her into the company on both an individual level,
and functionally. Specifically, she became co-leader of Gensler's workplace practice, the top revenue line of
business at the firm, for three years. With a team of principals, she led the development of new services,
thought leadership initiatives, and a research program that helped lead to significant growth of the practice,
from 30 to 40 percent annual growth over the period.
Kirkpatrick's story and her appointment in 2006 to CMO at Gensler
could not have happened in an organization that was not willing to allow this kind of professional growth to
happen in the first place, or without a mentor who believed in her ability to contribute on a strategic
level.
"Doing things differently" does not need to become a vexing paradox for professional firms.
Professional and business-to-business executive managers should continue to welcome internal entrepreneurship
and individual professional passion. But they should filter these and other narrowly defined initiatives for
their potential to foster marketing and business development integration.
Anything less leaves the organization vulnerable to yet another layer of disconnectivity.
Write
me to share your experiences with the paradox of doing things differently.
Take
the confidential, web-based Marketplace Masters professional
service firm differentiation assessment test for
instant feedback on whether your firm is doing differentiation
right.
©
2009 Expertise
Marketing, LLC All Rights Reserved
|